Unequal Treatment of Marriage and Registered Civil Partnerships violated German constitution

Unequal Treatment of Marriage and Registered Civil Partnerships violated German constitution

Federal Constitutional Court - Press office -


Order of 21 July 2010 – 1 BvR 611/07, 1 BvR 2464/07

Unequal Treatment of Marriage and Registered Civil Partnerships in
Gift and Inheritance Tax Act Unconstitutional

Pursuant to the provisions in §§ 15, 16, 17, and 19 of the Gift and
Inheritance Tax Act in the version dated 20 December 1996 from the 1997
Annual Tax Reform Act (Erbschaftsteuer- und Schenkungsteuergesetz a.F.
(a.F. – alte Fassung – former version) – ErbStG a.F.) registered civil
partners after creation of the legal institution of civil partnerships
in 2001, were significantly more burdened than spouses under inheritance
tax law.

While pursuant to §§ 15.1 and 19.1 ErbStG a.F. spouses were subject to
the most beneficial Tax Class 1 and, depending upon the amount of the
inheritance, were subject to a tax rate between 7 and 30 %, civil
partners were classified as “other recipients” and placed in Tax Class
III, which provides for tax rates of between 17 and 50 %. Moreover, §
16.1 no. 1 ErbStG a.F. granted spouses a personal exemption in the
amount of DM 600,000/€ 307,000 and § 17.1 ErbStG a.F. granted a special
exemption for retirement benefits in the amount of DM 500,000/€ 256,000.
On the other hand, registered civil partners, because of their placement
in Tax Class III, were only entitled to an exemption in the amount of DM
10,000/€ 5,200 (§ 16.1 no. 5, § 15.1 ErbStG a.F.). They were completely
excluded from the benefit of the tax exemption for retirement benefits.

In the Inheritance Tax Reform Act (Erbschaftsteuerreformgesetz) of 24
December 2008, the provisions described above in the Gift and
Inheritance Tax Act were amended to the benefit of registered civil
partners to the extent that the personal exemption and the exemption for
retirement benefits are determined in the same way for both inheriting
civil partners and spouses. Nevertheless, registered civil partners
continue to be treated like distant relatives and unrelated persons and
taxed at the highest tax rates. Pursuant to the Federal Government’s
draft legislation for the 2010 Annual Tax Reform Act of 22 June 2010,
complete equality for civil partners and spouses in the gift and
Inheritance tax law – also in regard to tax rates – is intended.

Complainant no. 1 is the sole heir of his male civil partner who passed
away in August 2001; complainant no. 2 is the heir of her female civil
partner who passed away in February 2002. In both cases the tax office
set the inheritance tax in accordance with a tax rate from Tax Class III
and granted the minimum exemption pursuant to § 16.1 no. 5 ErbStG a.F..
The lawsuits filed by the complainants against these decisions were
unsuccessful in the finance courts.

As to their constitutional complaints, the First Senate of the Federal
Constitutional Court decided that the inheritance tax law discrimination
against registered civil partners in comparison to spouses regarding the
personal exemption and the tax rate, as well as their exclusion from the
exemption for retirement benefits, is incompatible with the general
principle of equality (Article 3.1 of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz – GG)).
The orders by the Federal Finance Court (Bundesfinanzhof) have been
reversed and the matters have been referred back to it for new
decisions. The legislature has until 31 December 2010 to enact a new
rule for those old cases affected by the Gift and Inheritance Tax Act,
former version, that removes the infringement on equality from the time
period between the effective date of the Act on the Termination of the
Discrimination of Same-Sex Couples (Gesetz zur Beendigung der
Diskriminierung gleichgeschlechtlicher Gemeinschaften) of 16 February
2001 until the effective date of the Inheritance Tax Reform Act of 24
December 2008.

In essence, the decision is based on the following considerations:

As to discriminating against registered civil partners in comparison to
spouses there is no difference that is of such weight that it could
justify the disadvantage to civil partners in the Gift and Inheritance
Tax Act in the version pursuant to the 1997 Annual Tax Reform Act. This
applies to the personal exemption pursuant to § 16 ErbStG a.F., to the
exemption for retirement benefits pursuant to § 17 ErbStG a.F., and to
the tax rate pursuant to § 19 ErbStG a.F.

Granting a privilege to spouses and not to civil partners under the law
regarding the personal exemption cannot be justified solely by reference
to the state’s special protection of marriage and the family (Article
6.1 GG). If the promotion of marriage is accompanied by unfavourable
treatment of other ways of life, even where these are comparable to
marriage with regard to the life situation provided for and the
objectives pursued by the legislation, the mere reference to the
requirement of protecting marriage under Article 6.1 of the Basic Law
does not justify such a differentiation. The authority of the state to
become active for marriage and the family in fulfilment of its duty of
protection as set forth in Article 6.1 GG remains completely unaffected
by the question of the extent to which others can assert claims for
equal treatment. Only the principle of equality (Article 3.1 GG), in
accordance with the principles of application developed by the Federal
Constitutional Court on this, determines whether and to what extent
others, in this case registered civil partners, have a claim for
treatment equal to the statutory or actual promotion of married spouses
and family members.

 

Rate this page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 Rates (100 %)
Rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
5
5
 

Do you have any questions? We would be pleased to assist you. To make getting in touch with us as simple and efficient as possible for both parties, we ask you to primarily use our contact form for your questions. Please describe the matter as clearly as possible. You can also add attachments. After sending your inquiry, the attorney responsible will contact you either by telephone or by e-mail within 24 hours and, where necessary, pose further questions or submit a proposal for consultation.  

Of course, you can also call us directly to make an appointment for a personal consultation or telephone consultation (find contact details here). All potential clients will be informed in advance of any costs that may be incurred during the initial consultation

Formular
captcha
Attach documents to your message to us (max 5 MB).

Related publications